5/20/04
DETROIT (Reuters) - The Detroit Zoo will become the first major zoo to stop exhibiting elephants on ethical grounds because they can develop arthritis and stress-related ailments in captivity, officials said on Thursday.
The Detroit Zoo has one of the largest facilities in the country, but its Asian elephants Winky and Wanda still have recurring foot problems due to the cold weather, Director Ron Kagen told Reuters.
In the wild, elephants roam vast areas, live in large families, and exhibit some of the same social traits as humans such as forming friendships and mourning for their dead.
"Elephants seem to be intelligent and even social in ways that are similar to humans," Kagen said. "Elephants can suffer from similar things to what we suffer from when we're in difficult environments."
Confined to zoos and circuses, elephants develop physical problems and neurotic behaviors such as rocking back and forth and aggressive behavior, he said.
"If we don't feel like we can (keep elephants), then the question is, who can and how?," he said. "For us, there really is a big question about whether elephants should be in captivity at all."
Kagen likens the change to the decision to stop performances by elephants and chimpanzees years ago at the zoo because of the stress it placed on the animals.
The zoo expects to send Winky and Wanda to an animal sanctuary this summer where they can roam with other elephants.
"I think it is an enormously important precedent," Wayne Pacelle, chief executive officer of the Humane Society of the United States, told Reuters. "It should trigger the examination of the treatment of elephants in other zoos and in circuses throughout the country."
Other zoos have also given away their elephants because they had health problems due to inadequate faculties, Pacelle said. But the Detroit Zoo is the first with sizable grounds and adequate care to end its elephant exhibit on ethical grounds, he said.
Ohhh…. those poor pachyderms. I hope they get released into the wild and someone poaches them within a week. Believe you me, I need a new piano with shiny new keys! I mean seriously, don’t organizations like PETA and the Humane Society have anything better to do than to look out for animals? The short answer is no. I don’t get it. When did animals have rights?
ANIMALS HAVE NO RIGHTS. These whackos who are funding (donate money to) PETA and HSUS need to wake up and begin donating to helping better
human life. How about helping humanity out and help provide food and clothing for the poor. Or how spending some money to cure a few diseases? Are bad knees on elephants really that high on peoples agenda? This world at times is unbelievable and sickening.
- POST THOUGHT (added at 10:44pm) -
Being a Christian, I find it very important to justify my beliefs, and to make sure I'm following God and trying my best to follow His Word.
Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Main Entry: do·min·ion
Pronunciation: d&-'mi-ny&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English dominioun, from Middle French dominion, modification of Latin dominium, from dominus
1 : DOMAIN
2 : supreme authority : SOVEREIGNTY
3 plural : an order of angels -- see CELESTIAL HIERARCHY
4 often capitalized : a self-governing nation of the Commonwealth of Nations other than the United Kingdom that acknowledges the British monarch as chief of state
5 : absolute ownership
If we being humans are given dominion over all that is mentioned above, what is one to think when PETA and HSUS start giving animals rights and telling people what they can or can't do to animals. Now if you are beating a dog with a Louisville Slugger is that justified, because you have dominion over everything? A better question is, are you acting like a Christian beating the snot out of a dog? Food for thought...